GT
Good Times Restaurants Inc. (GTIM)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 was soft: total revenues fell 3.3% year over year to $34.3M, net loss to common shareholders was $0.6M (–$0.06 diluted EPS), and Adjusted EBITDA was $1.0M .
- Same-store sales declined at both brands (Bad Daddy’s −3.7%, Good Times −3.6%); Bad Daddy’s maintained a 13.6% restaurant-level operating profit margin despite lower average unit volumes, while Good Times margins compressed to 8.0% .
- Management paused share repurchases to prioritize cash accumulation and debt repayment; sequential sales improved during the quarter, with marketing tests in connected TV/streaming showing promise .
- No formal numeric guidance was provided; management flagged continued ground beef inflation and higher labor/training costs into Q3, and expects G&A to run 6–7% of revenues for FY25 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Bad Daddy’s cost control: “our 13.6% Restaurant Level Operating Profit margin matched the prior year despite the deleveraging pressure of lower average unit volumes” .
- Menu and beverage innovation: Smash n’ Stack burger moved to #4 in mix with better margin; $8 “Bad Ass Margarita” and zero-proof cocktails launched; Cinco de Mayo promotions drove “exceptionally strong” sales .
- Marketing tests: connected TV/streaming and targeted digital spend showed promising early results; expansion planned in Q3 .
What Went Wrong
- Same-store sales pressure: Bad Daddy’s −3.7%; Good Times −3.6% for the quarter; Good Times margins were hit by competitive discounting and elevated costs (food, labor, occupancy, other operating) .
- Commodity inflation: ground beef costs “significantly elevated” versus prior year and expected to continue increasing; eggs spiked mid-quarter before moderating but remained above prior year .
- Impairment and profitability: reported an impairment of long-lived assets ($0.494M) and posted a net loss to common shareholders of $(0.624)M (–$0.06 diluted EPS) .
Financial Results
Consolidated Performance vs Prior Year and Prior Quarter
Segment Breakdown (Company-Owned Restaurants)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Note: No formal numeric guidance for revenues, margins, EPS, tax rate, or dividends was provided .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “The second fiscal quarter was disappointing, though sales improved sequentially throughout the quarter... I am impressed with our ability to control costs at our Bad Daddy’s brand as our 13.6% Restaurant Level Operating Profit margin matched the prior year...” — Ryan M. Zink, CEO .
- “We tested connected TV and streaming video advertising... with promising results. We are expanding this advertising during the remainder of the June quarter...” .
- “Good Times’ performance... experienced both sales declines and margin compression, most notably due to the continued discounting by our competitors... we are re‐evaluating our media mix... streaming video and connected TV...” .
- “Sales improved sequentially throughout the quarter at both brands... marked differences... with the Colorado Bad Daddy’s sales performance more aligned with Good Times...” .
- “Our team is focused on the right initiatives to drive long-term sales, traffic and profitability gains... guest-first mindset...” .
Q&A Highlights
- Q2 2025 call had no analyst Q&A; the operator noted no questions before concluding the call .
- Prior quarter Q1 themes (for context): capital allocation (share repurchases balanced with capex), legal case status (awaiting District Court ruling), seasonality impacts (winter months weaker; weather disruptions), and customer demographics insights (GT slightly male; BD balanced, upper-income blue-collar psychographic) .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus coverage for GTIM was unavailable for Q2 2025 (Primary EPS Consensus Mean, Revenue Consensus Mean, Target Price, Consensus Recommendation returned no values). As a result, we cannot quantify beats/misses versus Wall Street estimates for Q2 2025.*
- Reported actuals: revenue $34.279M and Adjusted EBITDA $1.021M for Q2 2025; diluted EPS −$0.06 . Given declining comps and margin compression at Good Times, coverage models (where they exist) may need to reflect higher commodity and labor costs and the near-term pause in buybacks; however, no consensus data was available to benchmark this.*
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Bad Daddy’s resilience: despite softer volumes, maintained 13.6% restaurant-level margins; innovation (Smash n’ Stack, beverage overhaul) and targeted pricing support profitability .
- Good Times margin reset: competitive discounting and elevated costs compressed margins to 8.0%; operational overhaul and marketing pivot aim to restore value perception and traffic .
- Cost inflation remains a headwind: management expects continued ground beef pressure and higher labor/training costs into Q3; monitor commodity trends and labor mix .
- Capital stance turned conservative: buybacks paused to bolster liquidity and reduce debt; near-term free cash flow prioritized for balance sheet strength and remodels .
- Marketing evolution as a catalyst: connected TV/streaming and precision digital/OOH could drive traffic; watch for efficacy updates in Q3 .
- Colorado divergence: regional softness weighed on both brands; any normalization in local trends could support sequential improvement .
- No formal guidance: trade setup hinges on near-term traffic recovery, margin containment at Good Times, and sustaining Bad Daddy’s mix/pricing strategy; lack of consensus estimates limits beat/miss framing this quarter .